Author Archive

Filtering Reality

March 1, 2013 Leave a comment

The topic that has intrigued me the most this year in government class is filter bubbles. My dad has taught me ever since I was a child that I should always inform myself on both sides of an issue, consider each party fairly, and made an educated decision based on the facts. I had never heard the term “filter bubbles”, but after studying them in government, these are exactly what my dad warned me about. Simply put, “Google’s search term personalisation is detrimental to the idea of the internet as a community and is, therefore, skewing debates and discussions” (Blackburne). It is impossible to have a clear view on any topic without eliminating the bias and censorship that is inherent in any controversy.

Source: Insightful Presentations

Filter bubbles are essentially ‘tailored’ news coverage and story details. They are based on a preconceived algorithm that formulaically decides what any given person is most likely to view. While this sounds like a decent idea at first, the way that filter bubbles are implemented in society today has caused detrimental damage to our understanding of current events. These filters often cause important key information to be left out when a simple Google search is used. In fact, “From the very instant they first boot up their computer in the morning, their in-boxes comprise an unbroken catalog of outrage stories ideologically tailored to their pre-existing obsessions” (Washington Post). Furthermore, social networking sites have begun to adopt these filter bubbles to accurately target advertisements to a select group of users. Depending on what pages you click on, whose profiles you visit, and what you search for on Facebook; the ads that appear on side of the page are often times eerily familiar. That new album you just looked up? It may instantly appear on a pop-up ad just moments later. It’s almost frightening how interwoven the web has become.

Taking all of this into account, it is important to point out that while it is necessary to eliminate filter bubbles in certain settings to obtain accurate information; filter bubbles can be manipulated to be exercised for useful purposes. For example, different filter bubbles could be created (like a RSS feed) for different sides and opinions on any given story. Following this idea, it would be easy to sort and sift through basic facts from each side. This could essentially create clear-cut, categorized outlines of each party’s main topical points.

Source: Don’t Bubble Us

I am thankful that this year in government I got to experience learning about our nation without bias induced by filter bubbles or in any other way. After taking this course, I am confident that the best way to approach any issue in life is to look at both sides of an issue equally and impartially. Carefully considering things that I may initially oppose often times gives me new perspective and understanding on the subject being discussed. Unfortunately, filter bubbles are easily able to hinder this critical thinking that schools so intentionally foster. If visiting a prominent news website if filtering out things it thinks ‘won’t pertain to us’; how can we effectively evaluate any related situation? Our country needs consistency, and that includes accurate portrayal and coverage in the news.

Overall, filter bubbles aren’t being used productively by society today because citizens are only getting their initial views reinforced and aren’t being exposed to alternative options. Instead of increasing awareness on fact and different theories, our world is being shut off from a tolerant understanding of beliefs different from our own. Constantly reinforcing only our own opinions does not promote growth or change in any environment. For this reason, filter bubbles need to carefully utilized in a way that encourages American citizens to take a more active role in their government.


Obama Approval Ratings Soar

February 21, 2013 2 comments

President Barack Obama’s approval rating has just reached a record-setting high when compared with the past three years of his presidency. A Bloomberg poll, conducted nationally, released Wednesday shows that nearly 55% of responders approved Obama’s performance in office (Bloomberg). Since Osama Bin Laden’s death, his approval statistics have been continually rising (Huffington Post). Looking at these facts alone, it would seem that the President is doing an exceptional job as Manager of Prosperity and even Voice of the People. However, these numbers don’t tell the whole story regarding the general sentiment of the American people.

Source: The Stapletonion

First, the Bloomberg poll also reveals that the same percentage, 55%, disapprove of how Obama has handled the federal budget deficit. Without significant changes, this could quickly disintegrate Obama’s perceived success. In order for the President to reverse this majority opinion, federal spending needs to be cut. It is not enough to only raise taxes – the government has a spending problem. If government programs across the board were to cut their budgets by even a small fraction, the multi-trillion dollar deficit we are currently entrenched in would certainly not continue to get to an absurdly out of control amount. If anything, this small reduction in spending will only help our country’s current situation. The fiscal cliff still looms threateningly in the future, and cutting government spending is the only way to ensure that our country’s economy is back on the right track toward a healthy state.

Source: ICIC

Next, the poll states that a mere 49% of Americans approve of how Obama has handled the economy since he was first elected into office. Although ‘handling the economy’ involves many different areas and aspects to consider, focusing on a few major points will portray the overall picture. First, it would be beneficial for Obama to express clearly how he plans to handle a looming recession that could potentially happen due to a fiscal cliff. Deadlines have repeatedly been ignored when it comes to making a final clear-cut compromise regarding this issue.  Postponing the formulation of a concrete plan is only making Americans grow more and more weary. Yes, some tax reformations have been addressed, but another large part of the problem – government spending, has not even been remotely touched on. If Obama wants better ratings and satisfaction from the American people, he must give a direct answer to this problem. Second, Obama may want to spend some additional time considering his recent proposition to increase minimum wage. This sounds good in theory, but more money per person means less total jobs. Unemployment rates have been steadily improving recently, and reversing this trend would not be of great advantage to the president. He could theoretically still raise minimum wage incrementally, but a drastic increase will not be supported by today’s economy.  With these and a few other improvements, Obama’s approval within American society will continue to raise even more than it already has.

In conclusion, Obama has the potential to rally the spirits of the American people to improve the economic state of our economy if he makes careful, rational decisions.  Obama needs to take responsibility of giving the American people the clear answers that they deserve. If he does this, the people of our nation will all be on the same page when it comes to working together as one united whole to enhance the situation that the United States is in.

%d bloggers like this: